Artist Shiv Ravi Shankar with his work at a Chennai art exhibition. Photo Credit: Special Arrangement
“Here a real human artist,” says an entire squad of artists on X. “I have painted using my hands,” add many, sharing their art on stage never before. This is new to the artists, and you might guess why.
For the last one week, social media has been flooded with AI-Janit Studio Ghibali-Eske images, and the Internet is now saturated. There have been Yay or Nay debate with several fans of Hoyo Miyanaki, the founder of the studio Ghibali, who are feeling below.
But hold, the mixture has another brush separate conversation, you have very local artists. While some users are coughing cash for membership of chats, just to get them Disgusting In their city, independent small artists and painters are struggling with it to get into their way among all this.

Chennai-based artist Varsha (Urmei) believes that AI-art art will put a lot of pressure on local artists who run small businesses, especially when brands begin to choose for AI on human creators. “Such trends produce inappropriate expectations and unrealistic deadlines,” she says. “The art is not about churning the beautiful images. It takes time, where the idea for artists is full of research, testing and error, and individual story. But with the speed of AI, customers may not be understood anymore.”

Artist Varsha (Urimei) sketch with curious children. Photo Credit: Special Arrangement
Despite the online debate about AI, people expect Ms. Varsha a flicker to remove art as a career. But he is in a hurry to indicate the irony, “You see, people are ready to pay for AI-rented art, but the artists hesitate to impartly compensate, because for them, it is more about the ownership of a piece, which is more about the ownership of a piece than the real effort and intention behind the creation.”
Shiva Ravi Shankar, a 19 -year -old artist from Chennai, says, while the general public is bored with the gallery of their phone and is just going for a tendency for curiosity, its implications for local artists. He says, “We rely on social media to promote our work, because we are still small, and need a medium to reach people. But now it is likely that AI will copy the styles of our local artists to generate images as well,” they say. However, he strongly believes that it lacks originality. “When you give some meaningful gifts, you will choose an original piece on the AI-based image, okay? But the brand can now cut the cost using AI, which puts the painters and designers at risk,” says Sri Shiva.
Support local artists:
Multi -apertial artist Roshni urged people to support local creators. “There are many local artists who can experiment, but put their hearts in it,” she says. “If you take time out to find the artist you appreciate and are working, you will realize that you will feel more connected to the piece,” Ms. Roshni says. As the artists have called a double standard that people emphasize handmade art, but do not blink the payment to AI, Ms. Roshni shares a reminder to seek emerging artists for those on a budget.
Within an Indian context, many painters in rural settings are still seen as “laborers” instead of creative, Sri Shiva says. In urban places, young independent artists do painting for eight hours and then spend one and four hours for material manufacture so that simply be visible. “Now, being an artist means scripting the reels, installing lights and cracking the algorithm,” they say. “In this era of AI, wireless skills matters more.”
Published – April 01, 2025 09:00 PM IST