Like the Bollywood Potobiler, the plot of the National Film Awards becomes thicker with each passing year. Why did the jury choose polarization story Story of Kerala For two awards? Why did the jury wake up for Shah Rukh Khan’s talent after 33 years?
Story of Kerala Disputed controversy for women depicting women in Kerala was tremendously converted and recruited by the Islamic State. While Sudipto Sen’s questioning the decision to make the best director the best, argued that the film “promoted a major propaganda with a hate -filled agenda with a hate -filled agenda,” Ashutosh Govarkar, the head of the jury, realized that Sen would have “done with a tough subject with a difficult topic”, which would have happened with deepest research.
The Supreme Court compulsorily stated dishonor for the film that it is “a fictional account of events” and no “authentic data” to support the claim that 32,000 women were converted to Islam in Kerala, but the manufacturers have reiterated that the film is based on real events and “is not based on isolated or imagined events.”
While the Government of India presents the National Film Award, he does not necessarily represent a unique government’s perspective on cinema. They are aimed at promoting unity and integrity through appreciation of various cultures, recognizing and celebrating cinematic excellence in languages and styles.
However, rapid, the National Film Awards are seen as a platform to support those who are taking the line of idea to the ruling distribution for the audience. An important part of the audience votes for the BJP. This makes a commercial understanding to give a cultural reference to filmmakers for a cultural reference to its political ideas and social fear. In addition, it provides soft strength to spin doctors to determine the story on social media. Drab WhatsApp forward is lived with inspiring scenes. To create fear or hate for a group of people, one of the cinematic devices is to prepare a story that says, ‘ Other Our women are after. ,
At various points in cinematic history, it has been effectively used in creating a social story against African Americans and Jews. If a part of the Hindi film audience feels that Kerala is running again under the so -called ‘Love Jihad’, even if the number is exaggerated and the craft is low, emotional effects, emotional effects Story of Kerala It is adequate.
When? Kashmir files Nargis Dutt Award for Best Feature Film on National Integration in 2021, many felt that they were living in an alternative reality because in the past, like films Garm wind, TamasAnd Religion Won this prestigious honor, which has now been converted into the best feature film promoting national, social and environmental values. However, when placed in context, the award appears to be in line with the current government policy on Kashmir, where the cancellation of Article 370 is seen as aligning with the concept of national integration.
Keep in perspective, node for jury Story of Kerala Does not come as surprise. Like Kashmir files, Kerala Story The BJP’s top leadership is openly supported. It was declared tax-free in BJP ruled states. Like the story of forced conversion shown in the film, it appears to be a tool for the audience to brainwash the audience to trust the unilateral story.
Urvashi (left) won the Best Supporting Actress Award for her performance in ‘Ulojuku’. , Photo Credit: Special Arrangement
The film does not question the silence of the Islamic State on the question of Palestine. While the manufacturers claim that they are not Islamophobes, they use a creative license to target Islam by presenting it as a religion, the very price system of which prepares its followers for extremist ideas. Originally, the film sees a terrible intention in every Hindu-Muslim conversation, pretending to WhatsApp forward.
Govarikar allegedly considering access to box office performance, social impact and winner when deciding. Of course, there are films and performances where artistic ability, social impact and popular appeal actually come together. This year, we have 12th failureWhere Vidya Vinod Chopra and Vikrant Massey completed this rare meeting of reach and craftsmanship, where Atal Bihari VajPP Harr Nahin Manong, Rar Nahin Thanoga (will not give up, will not complain) Aesthet has been integrated into the story as an orphan to social inequalities.
However, when it comes to selection between artistic qualification and box office number, general knowledge suggests that the jury should prioritize the former.
Also Read: ‘Ullozhukku’ Movie Review: Urvashi’s powerhouse performance bears this ghost drama
The National Film Awards are not new to public investigation, but during the Congress rule or Congress -backed governments, controversies were less about clear political campaigning and were more about systemic issues, such as nepotism, jury bias and lack of transparency. In 1976, during the period of acute political upheaval, Mrinal Sen Deer Won the National Film Award. A clear criticism of capitalist power during the Emergency, utpaalendu chakraborty’s Choky Won Best Film Award in 1982, and GV Iyer’s Sanskrit biopic Adi Shankaracharya Got it the following year.
Over the years, the difference between the best film and offering of the best film has become increasingly blurred. This year again, like films acclaimed by reviewers Yoram And the three of us Could not affect the jury.
The criteria behind nominating an actor in a particular category have also been questioned. Veteran actors Urvashi and Vijayaraghavan have been awarded the best actor in the supporting role Owljuku And Pokalam, But Vijayaraghavan won the Best Actor Award at the Kerala Film Critics Awards, while Urvashi received the Best Actress Award for the same performance at the Kerala State Film Awards.
Even more importantly, the jury often bows to the actor’s stature instead of its immediate performance. A link is usually drawn between the jury and the actor’s head. Won node for Ajay Devgan Wound When Prakash Jha led the jury. Ramesh Sippy led the jury when Amitabh Bachchan was selected Clean And PicuAnd Priyadarshan was in the hull when Akshay Kumar won the prestigious award Rustam,
Despite receiving immense praise for his efforts in ‘Aadujeevitham’, Prithviraj Sukumaran missed the National Film Awards. , Photo Credit: Special Arrangement
Sippy once told this journalist that anyone can question the option but should not question the integrity of the jury. Therefore, when Gowariker announced Shah Rukh’s name, it seemed as if the director was correcting the wrong, as he was denied the award. ShrubsAnd Saif Ali Khan was surprisingly more qualified We tums. This was the time when Sharmila Tagore was in cases of cases in the Central Board of Film Certification.
Also Read: ‘Jawan’ Movie Review: Shah Rukh Khan is fantastic in Atley’s social-charge thriller
Also, if political messages Story of Kerala The objective of the ruling dispensation, the subject of Atli works young Question its politics. Shah Rukh plays the role of Azad, a soldier, Vikram Rathore’s son, who lectures the audience to ask for his votes, “What will they do for you?” Drawing from the popular couple of noted Urdu poet Wasim Barelvi, he sings, “Usulain pe jahan ach ach takrana zaruri, Banda Zinda Ho Se Nazar Aana Zaruri Hai Hai Hai” (When the principles are at stake, someone should fight. This fight is what keeps you alive).
There are varieties of stolen EVMs, false allegations against a Muslim doctor, and a piece of piece is desperate to mudge the country’s natural resources because they feel that they can ignore the democratic process. However, this can be a safe condition compared to Shahrukh PathanWhich is slightly more leveled in his depiction of dissatisfaction, where the villain is a man of an evil army.
moreover, young Despite a magnificent turn, Prithviraj appears as a powerful option to keep Sukumaran out of controversy Aadujeevitham: goat life, Interestingly, the film questions the practice of slavery in West Asia, where the encyclopsure and slave people follow the same religion, but on the contrary Story of Kerala, Director Blessings make it about humanity rather than belief. Or, as Urvashi suggested, Prithviraj may be “ Impuan The controversy, where, as a director, dug the ghost of Gujarat riots. On the contrary, Shah Rukh played a diplomatic role in the national interest without allegedly claiming credit. Our films can lose deeply, but our awards continue to follow a layered script!
