For Governor Yadav Atta patta missing It was a comedy film that marked an important chapter in his career.

Instead, the 2012 film became the focus of a long-running legal and financial battle that the actor says has cost him far more than the original controversy ever involved.

Appearing in person before the Supreme Court on Wednesday in a check bounce case related to the production of the film, Governor Yadav spoke at length about the financial losses he claims to have suffered over the years. At the heart of the case was a genuine financial dispute of around Rs 5 crore.

According to the actor, as a result Rs 22 crore was at stake and his career and reputation suffered a lot.

According to ANI, Governor Yadav told the bench that his financial woes extended beyond this one project. “Sir, I salute you. I have done 200-250 films. I have also made a loss of 200-250 crores in the last 13 years. Atta patta missing I have suffered a loss of Rs 17 crore.

The actor also claimed that his own 17 crore rupees are stuck because of this Atta patta is missing. He alleged that the release of the film has been badly affected due to the press conference held against him.

“A press conference was held against me. My film was shelved. It was supposed to be released in 1,200 theatres, but not a single theatre.”

How did the dispute of 5 crore rupees happen?

The legal dispute dates back to around 2010, when Governor Yadav borrowed around Rs 5 crore from Murali Projects Private Limited. atta patta missing, His directorial venture.

The film did not perform as expected, and a disagreement over repayment resulted in check-bounce proceedings after allegedly dishonoring checks issued for repayment. The dispute, which started with Rs 5 crore, continued through the courts for years, with interest and other charges accruing.

Governor Yadav while addressing the Supreme Court described the results in dramatic terms.

“This is the Merchant of Venice case, sir. But the total was Rs 22 crores. Of my Rs 17 crores since 2013, only Rs 5 crores buried in the ground.”

The actor said that the original liability of Rs 5 crore was later settled for Rs 8 crore.

“Rs 5 crores became Rs 8 crores. The main last line will speak.”

He also maintained that he was willing to pay the original amount long ago, but claimed that the long-running dispute had consequences on his career that went far beyond the money.

“Rs 5 crore was still major in 2012. But this Rs 5 crore didn’t sink my Rs 22 crore. In the last 16 years, the branding was ruined and I became infamous.”

‘Now I will drag you to court’

Recalling how the financial arrangement took place, Governor Yadav told the court that the complainant was his friend when the deal was struck. According to the actor, he was initially assured that the Rs 5 crore involved was not a significant amount for the complainant.

“In 2012, my friend said, I am a multi-crore man, where does Rs 5 crore come from, where does it go… Then he said, now I have to fight you in court.”

A long legal battle followed. The Delhi High Court ultimately upheld Yadav’s conviction in the check bounce cases and sentenced him to three months imprisonment in each of the seven cases. The court also took note of his repeated failure to meet payment commitments.

After this, Governor Yadav challenged the order of the High Court and knocked the door of the Supreme Court. The apex court granted relief directing him to pay the due amount.

However, this relief came with conditions. The Supreme Court had repeatedly pressed the actor to comply with its payment instructions.

The court had on September 15 given Governor Yadav a final opportunity of two weeks to deposit Rs 2 crore and submit a concrete repayment plan. The matter returned to court after questions were raised about his compliance with earlier directives.

Governor Yadav appeared in the Supreme Court

On Wednesday, Governor Yadav appeared before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalaya Bagchi and V. Appeared personally with Mohana.

He brought a demand draft of Rs 1.15 crore and assured the court that the remaining Rs 85 lakh would be settled through the sale of ancestral property. The prospective buyer was also present in court to demonstrate that the transaction would facilitate payment.

Governor Yadav told the court that the property is worth around Rs 30 crore and it is being sold to settle the outstanding liability. His lawyer also assured the bench that the actor is trying to rebuild his career, having started signing films again after years of litigation.

The court accepted the offer to pay Rs.2 crore.

However, the hearing was not without strong words from the bench. Justice Joymalia Bagchi warned Yadav that the three-month sentence awarded by the Delhi High Court was not necessary considering the consequences he might have to face given his behavior in complying with the court’s directives.

The judge indicated that if Governor Yadav’s counsel demanded his proper argument in this case, the court could also consider extending the sentence to two years.

The court, however, clarified that it is not taking such a step at this stage. Its immediate concern was to ensure that the complainant received the amount due. The Supreme Court indicated that once the payment issue is addressed, it will hear Governor Yadav’s challenge to the Delhi High Court order on merits.

CJI asked Governor Yadav to look ahead

Amid the serious proceedings, there was also a light conversation between the Chief Justice and the actor.

The CJI asked Yadav if he was working on something new.

“What are you making new?” asked the CJI.

Yadav reiterated that he was ready to return the money from the beginning.

“I am filling 2012 myself…not 5 crore rupees but only 22 crore rupees.”

The CJI then encouraged the actor to go ahead and come back to entertain the audience.

“Make a good film and entertain people,” said the CJI.

Rajpal Yadav responded by revealing that it was the trial that gave him the idea for the film. He said that he and his team had also discussed a title for the story inspired by the episode.

For an actor largely known for making audiences laugh, Atta patta missing So it has come to represent something much more complicated. What started as a film production financed by a Rs 5 crore loan eventually turned into a years-long legal battle, with Governor Yadav telling the Supreme Court that the outcome not only affected his finances but also his professional reputation.

Also Read: “Lawyers are good actors here”: Chief Justice-Rajpal Yadav’s joke on films